Zimbabwean vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,208,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 34.2 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $59,656, a difference of 10.4%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $100,962, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $99,943, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,328, a difference of 3.7%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $46,478, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $53,201, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 47.8%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 37.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.8%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 13.9%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 61.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.3%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.64%).