Lebanese vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,968,993 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Lebanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lebanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lebanese corresponds to an increase of 6.3 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,287 compared to $77,465, a difference of 24.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,355 compared to $58,162, a difference of 15.5%), and median household income ($88,091 compared to $98,496, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,840 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.56%), median male earnings ($57,409 compared to $56,872, a difference of 0.95%), and median earnings ($48,226 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 47.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 39.5%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.9%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.3%), currently married (47.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 39.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.7%).