Zimbabwean vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,097,792 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 10.7%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,735, a difference of 6.7%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $85,101, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $55,793, a difference of 0.91%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,554, a difference of 1.4%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $44,440, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 18.9%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.54%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 10.6%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.68%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 33.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.2%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.4%).