Zimbabwean vs African Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
African
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Africans
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
624
SOCIAL INDEX
3.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
341st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
African Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,307,732 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Africans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.399. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.513% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 513.0 Africans.
Zimbabwean vs African Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $84,925, a difference of 25.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $87,820, a difference of 25.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $78,986, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $46,838, a difference of 9.4%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $36,530, a difference of 11.7%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 14.7%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | African |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $37,785 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $87,820 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $72,650 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $41,955 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $47,994 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $36,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $46,838 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $78,986 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $84,925 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $53,711 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Zimbabwean vs African Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 59.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 53.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 11.8%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 17.5%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | African |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 16.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 22.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 22.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 21.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 24.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 33.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 12.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Zimbabwean vs African Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.7%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | African |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 11.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Zimbabwean vs African Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | African |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 80.5% |
Zimbabwean vs African Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 38.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.8%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (64.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | African |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Poor 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 40.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 41.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 39.7% |
Zimbabwean vs African Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 36.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 3.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 10.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | African |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 87.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 51.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Zimbabwean vs African Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.9%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | African |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Fair 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Poor 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 96.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Poor 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 94.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Tragic 91.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 89.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 87.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 83.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 61.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 55.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 41.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 32.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Zimbabwean vs African Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 29.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.2%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | African |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 26.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 48.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Fair 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.7% |