Zimbabwean vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,215,268 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.732. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.114% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 114.4 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,709, a difference of 6.7%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $86,398, a difference of 4.9%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $105,144, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $56,390, a difference of 0.16%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,563, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $47,470, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.3%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.47%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 10.2%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.12%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.20%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.4%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.6%).