Zimbabwean vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,780,711 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 37.8 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $60,581, a difference of 8.7%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $84,965, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.070%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $55,382, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $46,658, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 11.7%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.89%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.9%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.080%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.8%).