Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Turkey
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Immigrants from Turkey

Exceptional
Excellent
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,861
SOCIAL INDEX
86.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
43rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Turkey Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,983,969 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 35.1 Immigrants from Turkey.
Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants from Turkey Communities

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $51,368, a difference of 12.1%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $62,728, a difference of 11.4%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $52,960, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $66,672, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $52,503, a difference of 2.4%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Income
Income MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Turkey
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Exceptional
$51,368
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Exceptional
$118,325
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Exceptional
$96,964
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Exceptional
$52,960
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Exceptional
$62,728
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Exceptional
$44,066
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Good
$52,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Exceptional
$107,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Exceptional
$114,407
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Exceptional
$66,672
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.0%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.26%), single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Turkey
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.8%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Turkey
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.90%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Turkey
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.7%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.0%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.55%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Turkey
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Good
46.8%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
28.1%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 13.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Turkey
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
53.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
17.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.0% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Turkey
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Exceptional
65.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Exceptional
53.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Exceptional
46.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.6%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.79%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.96%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Turkey Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Turkey
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%