Nigerian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Nigerian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Nigerians
Chinese
1,996
SOCIAL INDEX
17.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
277th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Nigerian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,218,627 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Nigerian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.869. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nigerians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.261% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nigerians corresponds to an increase of 261.0 Chinese.
Nigerian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,992 compared to $77,465, a difference of 31.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($95,492 compared to $116,156, a difference of 21.6%), and median household income ($81,725 compared to $98,496, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,641 compared to $41,461, a difference of 4.6%), median earnings ($45,532 compared to $48,836, a difference of 7.3%), and median male earnings ($52,039 compared to $56,872, a difference of 9.3%).
Income Metric | Nigerian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,026 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $97,522 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Poor $81,725 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,532 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $52,039 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,641 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,416 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $87,730 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $95,492 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $58,992 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.0% | Average 25.9% |
Nigerian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 55.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 55.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.4%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 19.2%).
Poverty Metric | Nigerian | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Fair 21.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.3% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Nigerian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 63.6%), female unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 9.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Nigerian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Nigerian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.78%).
Labor Participation Metric | Nigerian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.6% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Fair 36.1% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.3% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.5% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.7% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Nigerian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.5%), family households (63.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Nigerian | Chinese |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.4% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.3% | Excellent 30.2% |
Nigerian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 47.2%), no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 46.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 28.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Nigerian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.0% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Nigerian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.2%), associate's degree (45.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and college, 1 year or more (58.5% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
Education Level Metric | Nigerian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.5% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 45.1% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.2% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.9% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Nigerian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 39.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.1%), female disability (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.9%).
Disability Metric | Nigerian | Chinese |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Excellent 12.0% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |