Immigrants from Ghana vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,897,766 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 11.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $77,465, a difference of 32.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,982 compared to $116,156, a difference of 22.3%), and median household income ($81,489 compared to $98,496, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $41,461, a difference of 3.9%), median earnings ($45,641 compared to $48,836, a difference of 7.0%), and median male earnings ($51,836 compared to $56,872, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 66.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 63.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.6%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 56.0%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.9%), and unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 54.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 101.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 71.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 10.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 26.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 47.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 76.9%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and college, under 1 year (63.1% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.90%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.1%).