Okinawan vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Okinawan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Okinawans

Chinese

Excellent
Exceptional
8,907
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
39th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Okinawan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,980,005 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Okinawan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Okinawans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.091% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Okinawans corresponds to an increase of 1,091.1 Chinese.
Okinawan Integration in Chinese Communities

Okinawan vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,817 compared to $46,098, a difference of 21.1%), median male earnings ($67,232 compared to $56,872, a difference of 18.2%), and median earnings ($57,550 compared to $48,836, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,701 compared to $58,162, a difference of 6.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,796 compared to $116,156, a difference of 7.4%), and median household income ($106,624 compared to $98,496, a difference of 8.3%).
Okinawan vs Chinese Income
Income MetricOkinawanChinese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$55,817
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$129,979
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$106,624
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$57,550
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,232
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,905
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,701
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,349
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$124,796
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$70,846
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Average
25.9%

Okinawan vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and single father poverty (14.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.2%).
Okinawan vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricOkinawanChinese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.6%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.9%
Exceptional
9.8%

Okinawan vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.8%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Okinawan vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOkinawanChinese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.3%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%

Okinawan vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
Okinawan vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOkinawanChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.6%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.8%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.7%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
84.1%

Okinawan vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 12.3%), family households (62.5% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and divorced or separated (10.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Okinawan vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOkinawanChinese
Family Households
Tragic
62.5%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.2%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.4%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.9%
Excellent
30.2%

Okinawan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 71.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 60.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 36.8%).
Okinawan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOkinawanChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.1%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
8.8%

Okinawan vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 85.9%), professional degree (7.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 64.0%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.9% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
Okinawan vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricOkinawanChinese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
73.7%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
69.0%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
57.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
22.6%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.3%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.3%
Fair
1.8%

Okinawan vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.7%), male disability (9.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.36%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.8%).
Okinawan vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricOkinawanChinese
Disability
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.8%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.7%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%