Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from El Salvador
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from El Salvador
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,475
SOCIAL INDEX
22.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
255th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,138,303 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.115. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.291% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 291.1 Immigrants from El Salvador.
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from El Salvador Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $38,394, a difference of 19.3%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $92,545, a difference of 18.9%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $47,973, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,599, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $36,673, a difference of 11.3%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $81,213, a difference of 11.6%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $38,394 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $92,545 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $81,213 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $42,413 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $47,973 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $36,673 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Exceptional $54,599 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $86,913 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $93,176 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $58,226 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 22.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 65.9%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 41.9%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.1%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.9%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.0% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 15.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 20.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 19.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 20.0% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Excellent 12.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 22.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from El Salvador Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 10.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 8.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from El Salvador Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.92%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from El Salvador |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Exceptional 66.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Tragic 34.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.3%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 27.0%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.70%), family households (64.1% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 6.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 67.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 44.3% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 7.6% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 43.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 36.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.0%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from El Salvador |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Average 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from El Salvador Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 124.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 56.9%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from El Salvador |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 95.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 94.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 94.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 93.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 90.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 89.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 86.8% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Tragic 85.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 83.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 80.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 77.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 56.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 51.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 38.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 31.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 16.3%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.11%), disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and female disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 25.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Fair 2.5% |