Zimbabwean vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Yakama

Exceptional
Poor
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,825,750 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.848. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.249% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 1,249.3 Yakama.
Zimbabwean Integration in Yakama Communities

Zimbabwean vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $33,009, a difference of 38.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $83,932, a difference of 31.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $76,226, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,321, a difference of 6.0%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $56,234, a difference of 17.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Income
Income MetricZimbabweanYakama
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
23.7%

Zimbabwean vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 125.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 119.6%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 16.3%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 21.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 24.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanYakama
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
21.4%

Zimbabwean vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 111.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 111.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 101.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanYakama
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.1%

Zimbabwean vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
80.6%

Zimbabwean vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 89.3%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 40.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.7%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanYakama
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
40.3%

Zimbabwean vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 100.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 52.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanYakama
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
12.9%

Zimbabwean vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 105.6%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 87.3%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanYakama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.3%

Zimbabwean vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 38.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanYakama
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%