Zimbabwean vs Moroccan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,457,182 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 11.3 Moroccans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $59,683, a difference of 10.3%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $100,138, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,804 compared to $45,854, a difference of 0.11%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $56,499, a difference of 0.35%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $48,838, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 39.0%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 34.6%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.33%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 10.8%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.78%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and family households (64.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 62.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.4%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%).