Yugoslavian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Yugoslavians
Chinese
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Yugoslavian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,411,906 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Yugoslavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yugoslavians corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Chinese.
Yugoslavian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,243 compared to $77,465, a difference of 33.0%), median household income ($82,186 compared to $98,496, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,558 compared to $116,156, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.1%), median male earnings ($53,967 compared to $56,872, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($45,846 compared to $48,836, a difference of 6.5%).
Income Metric | Yugoslavian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Fair $42,792 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,119 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,186 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,846 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,967 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,573 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,028 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,368 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $97,558 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,243 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Average 25.9% |
Yugoslavian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 34.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 32.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.6%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.9%).
Poverty Metric | Yugoslavian | Chinese |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.2% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.4% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Yugoslavian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.87%).
Unemployment Metric | Yugoslavian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Yugoslavian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
Labor Participation Metric | Yugoslavian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.8% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Yugoslavian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Yugoslavian | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.2% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.2% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.8% | Excellent 30.2% |
Yugoslavian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Yugoslavian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.1% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Yugoslavian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.0%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and associate's degree (46.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.34%), 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.37%).
Education Level Metric | Yugoslavian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.2% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.7% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.1% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Fair 1.8% |
Yugoslavian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.18%), male disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Disability Metric | Yugoslavian | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |