Central American vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,020,514 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $77,465, a difference of 37.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $116,156, a difference of 27.7%), and median family income ($91,087 compared to $116,188, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $58,162, a difference of 10.5%), wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $41,461, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 84.8%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 72.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.6%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 48.5%), female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 47.3%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.2%), family households (66.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 130.6%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.5%), and associate's degree (39.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.18%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.2%).