Chinese Social Profile

COMPARE

Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Select to Compare
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Profile
Social Profile
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Chinese Social Profile
Exceptional

9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Income

In terms of income, Chinese residing in the United States exhibit better household income with householder over the age of 65 ($77,465), household income with householder under the age of 25 ($58,162), and median household income ($98,496), but there is room for improvement in wage/income gap percentage (25.9%), median male earnings ($56,872), and per capita income ($46,098).
Chinese Income
Income MetricRating | RankValue
Per Capita Income
93.9
/100
|
#117
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
99.9
/100
|
#49
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
100.0
/100
|
#33
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
96.7
/100
|
#115
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
91.1
/100
|
#126
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
97.5
/100
|
#109
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
100.0
/100
|
#9
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
99.5
/100
|
#72
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
100.0
/100
|
#33
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
100.0
/100
|
#1
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
42.0
/100
|
#178
Average
25.9%

Chinese Poverty

In terms of poverty, Chinese residing in the United States exhibit better poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 (16.2%), poverty level among single females (16.1%), and poverty level among single mothers (24.6%), but there is room for improvement in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps (9.8%), poverty level among single fathers (15.4%), and poverty level among families (6.5%).
Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricRating | RankValue
Poverty
100.0
/100
|
#2
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
100.0
/100
|
#2
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
100.0
/100
|
#2
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
100.0
/100
|
#2
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
100.0
/100
|
#2
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
100.0
/100
|
#7
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
100.0
/100
|
#7
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
100.0
/100
|
#5
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
100.0
/100
|
#5
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
100.0
/100
|
#7
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
100.0
/100
|
#14
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
100.0
/100
|
#1
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
99.3
/100
|
#83
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
100.0
/100
|
#7
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
100.0
/100
|
#2
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
100.0
/100
|
#1
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
100.0
/100
|
#1
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
99.2
/100
|
#63
Exceptional
9.8%

Chinese Unemployment

In terms of unemployment, Chinese residing in the United States exhibit better unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 (4.2%), unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 (5.9%), and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 (4.4%), but there is room for improvement in unemployment rate among women with children between the ages 6 and 17 (9.3%), unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 (5.1%), and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 (4.3%).
Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRating | RankValue
Unemployment
99.9
/100
|
#16
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
99.3
/100
|
#41
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
100.0
/100
|
#7
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
99.9
/100
|
#29
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
99.9
/100
|
#29
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
100.0
/100
|
#18
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
99.6
/100
|
#32
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
97.7
/100
|
#55
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
99.1
/100
|
#32
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
100.0
/100
|
#8
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
100.0
/100
|
#19
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
100.0
/100
|
#3
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
100.0
/100
|
#2
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
100.0
/100
|
#1
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
100.0
/100
|
#2
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
99.9
/100
|
#53
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
5.2
/100
|
#225
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
99.5
/100
|
#25
Exceptional
4.9%

Chinese Labor Participation

In terms of labor participation, Chinese residing in the United States exhibit better labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 (77.3%), labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 (84.1%), and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 (80.7%), but there is room for improvement in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over (64.7%), labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 (84.3%), and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 (85.0%).
Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRating | RankValue
In Labor Force | Age > 16
7.3
/100
|
#230
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
99.9
/100
|
#33
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
98.8
/100
|
#107
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
100.0
/100
|
#49
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
12.7
/100
|
#210
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
89.6
/100
|
#131
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
99.4
/100
|
#57
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
99.9
/100
|
#13
Exceptional
84.1%

Chinese Family Structure

In terms of family structure, Chinese residing in the United States exhibit better percentage of family households (68.1%), percentage of married-couple family households (50.4%), and percentage of single father households (2.0%), but there is room for improvement in percentage of family households with children (26.0%), percentage of births to unmarried women (30.2%), and percentage of single mother households (5.2%).
Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRating | RankValue
Family Households
100.0
/100
|
#17
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
0.0
/100
|
#324
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
100.0
/100
|
#10
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
100.0
/100
|
#63
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
100.0
/100
|
#32
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
99.9
/100
|
#19
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
99.9
/100
|
#16
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
100.0
/100
|
#42
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
87.1
/100
|
#127
Excellent
30.2%

Chinese Vehicle Availability

In terms of vehicle availability, Chinese residing in the United States exhibit better percentage of households with 4 or more vehicles available (8.8%), percentage of households with 3 or more vehicles available (23.9%), and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available (60.1%), but there is room for improvement in percentage of households with no vehicle available (8.2%), percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available (91.9%), and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available (60.1%).
Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRating | RankValue
No Vehicles Available
99.8
/100
|
#62
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
99.8
/100
|
#63
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
100.0
/100
|
#36
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
100.0
/100
|
#19
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
100.0
/100
|
#14
Exceptional
8.8%

Chinese Education Level

In terms of education level, Chinese residing in the United States exhibit better percentage of population with at least 11th grade education (94.6%), percentage of population with no schooling (1.5%), and percentage of population with at least 10th grade education (95.5%), but there is room for improvement in percentage of population with at least doctorate degree education (1.8%), percentage of population with at least master's degree education (14.6%), and percentage of population with at least professional degree education (4.5%).
Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricRating | RankValue
No Schooling Completed
100.0
/100
|
#21
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
100.0
/100
|
#34
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
100.0
/100
|
#34
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
100.0
/100
|
#35
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
100.0
/100
|
#34
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
100.0
/100
|
#33
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
100.0
/100
|
#32
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
100.0
/100
|
#34
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
100.0
/100
|
#35
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
99.9
/100
|
#42
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
100.0
/100
|
#42
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
100.0
/100
|
#29
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
100.0
/100
|
#20
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
100.0
/100
|
#13
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
100.0
/100
|
#8
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
100.0
/100
|
#8
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
99.9
/100
|
#9
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
98.3
/100
|
#87
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
97.2
/100
|
#96
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
92.5
/100
|
#125
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
66.6
/100
|
#159
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
32.5
/100
|
#194
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
58.6
/100
|
#169
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
25.1
/100
|
#197
Fair
1.8%

Chinese Disability

In terms of disability, Chinese residing in the United States exhibit better percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 (4.7%), percentage of population with cognitive disability (15.9%), and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 (21.7%), but there is room for improvement in percentage of population with hearing disability (3.7%), percentage of males with a disability (12.1%), and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 (48.7%).
Chinese Disability
Disability MetricRating | RankValue
Disability
2.0
/100
|
#236
Tragic
12.2%
Males
0.4
/100
|
#255
Tragic
12.1%
Females
22.1
/100
|
#201
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
97.2
/100
|
#90
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
100.0
/100
|
#15
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
91.9
/100
|
#128
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
98.7
/100
|
#95
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
99.2
/100
|
#70
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
0.5
/100
|
#255
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
97.2
/100
|
#85
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
0.0
/100
|
#289
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
100.0
/100
|
#3
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
1.0
/100
|
#250
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
2.9
/100
|
#226
Tragic
2.6%

Common Questions

What are the strongest characteristics of Chinese in the United States?
The strongest characteristics of Chinese in the United States are:
#1
Unemployment Rate Amomg Seniors Over the Age of 65
4.2%
(100.0/100)
#2
Unemployment Rate Among Seniors Over the Age of 75
5.9%
(100.0/100)
#3
Unemployment Rate Among Population Between the Ages 65 and 74
4.4%
(100.0/100)
#4
Unemployment Rate Among Population Between the Ages 60 and 64
4.0%
(100.0/100)
#5
Percentage of Family Households
68.1%
(100.0/100)
What are the most vital challenges facing Chinese in the United States?
The most vital challenges facing Chinese in the United States are:
#1
Percentage of Population with Hearing Disability
3.7%
(0.0/100)
#2
Percentage of Family Households with Children
26.0%
(0.0/100)
#3
Percentage of Males with a Disability
12.1%
(0.4/100)
#4
Percentage of Population with a Disability Over the Age of 75
48.7%
(0.5/100)
#5
Percentage of Population with Ambulatory Disability
6.5%
(1.0/100)
What is Chinese per capita income in the United States?
Chinese per capita income in the United States is $46,098, which is exceptional, ranking it 117th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese median family income in the United States?
Chinese median family income in the United States is $116,188, which is exceptional, ranking it 49th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese median household income in the United States?
Chinese median household income in the United States is $98,496, which is exceptional, ranking it 33rd out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese median earnings in the United States?
Chinese median earnings in the United States is $48,836, which is exceptional, ranking it 115th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese median male earnings in the United States?
Chinese median male earnings in the United States is $56,872, which is exceptional, ranking it 126th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese median female earnings in the United States?
Chinese median female earnings in the United States is $41,461, which is exceptional, ranking it 109th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese wage/income gap percentage in the United States?
Chinese wage/income gap percentage in the United States is 25.9%, which is average, ranking it 178th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese poverty level in the United States?
Chinese poverty level in the United States is 9.5%, which is exceptional, ranking it 2nd out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese poverty level among families in the United States?
Chinese poverty level among families in the United States is 6.5%, which is exceptional, ranking it 2nd out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese poverty level among males in the United States?
Chinese poverty level among males in the United States is 8.7%, which is exceptional, ranking it 2nd out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese poverty level among females in the United States?
Chinese poverty level among females in the United States is 10.4%, which is exceptional, ranking it 2nd out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States?
Chinese poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States is 11.9%, which is exceptional, ranking it 5th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese poverty level among single males in the United States?
Chinese poverty level among single males in the United States is 11.0%, which is exceptional, ranking it 14th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese poverty level among single females in the United States?
Chinese poverty level among single females in the United States is 16.1%, which is exceptional, ranking it 1st out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese poverty level among single fathers in the United States?
Chinese poverty level among single fathers in the United States is 15.4%, which is exceptional, ranking it 83rd out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese poverty level among single mothers in the United States?
Chinese poverty level among single mothers in the United States is 24.6%, which is exceptional, ranking it 7th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States?
Chinese percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States is 9.8%, which is exceptional, ranking it 63rd out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese unemployment in the United States?
Chinese unemployment in the United States is 4.7%, which is exceptional, ranking it 16th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese unemployment rate among males in the United States?
Chinese unemployment rate among males in the United States is 4.9%, which is exceptional, ranking it 41st out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese unemploymnet rate among females in the United States?
Chinese unemploymnet rate among females in the United States is 4.5%, which is exceptional, ranking it 7th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese percentage of family households in the United States?
Chinese percentage of family households in the United States is 68.1%, which is exceptional, ranking it 17th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese percentage of family households with children in the United States?
Chinese percentage of family households with children in the United States is 26.0%, which is tragic, ranking it 324th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese percentage of married-couple family households in the United States?
Chinese percentage of married-couple family households in the United States is 50.4%, which is exceptional, ranking it 10th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese average family size in the United States?
Chinese average family size in the United States is 3.34, which is exceptional, ranking it 63rd out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese percentage of single father households in the United States?
Chinese percentage of single father households in the United States is 2.0%, which is exceptional, ranking it 32nd out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese percentage of single mother households in the United States?
Chinese percentage of single mother households in the United States is 5.2%, which is exceptional, ranking it 19th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese percentage of population currently married in the United States?
Chinese percentage of population currently married in the United States is 49.5%, which is exceptional, ranking it 16th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese percentage of population currently divorced or separated in the United States?
Chinese percentage of population currently divorced or separated in the United States is 11.2%, which is exceptional, ranking it 42nd out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States?
Chinese percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States is 30.2%, which is excellent, ranking it 127th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese percentage of population with a disability in the United States?
Chinese percentage of population with a disability in the United States is 12.2%, which is tragic, ranking it 236th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese percentage of males with a disability in the United States?
Chinese percentage of males with a disability in the United States is 12.1%, which is tragic, ranking it 255th out of 347 demographic groups.
What is Chinese percentage of females with a disability in the United States?
Chinese percentage of females with a disability in the United States is 12.3%, which is fair, ranking it 201st out of 347 demographic groups.

Definitions

Social Index (Si) is a quantitative measure of societal well-being and progress based on various factors and indicators.

Social Index Explained

Social Index refers to a cumulative metric used to assess and measure the overall well-being or social standing of a specific demographic group within a society. It combines multiple factors such as income, poverty rates, family structure, education levels, employment and unemployment rates, rates of illegitimate childbirths, divorce rates, and other relevant social indicators. The purpose of a social index is to provide a comprehensive snapshot of the social conditions and quality of life within a particular group.

Social Index Calculation

The calculation of a social index involves assigning weights or scores to various social factors and then summing up these scores to obtain an overall composite score. These scores are then multiplied by their respective weights and summed up to calculate the overall social index score for the demographic group being assessed. The resulting score provides a quantitative measure of the group's social well-being, allowing for comparisons, tracking changes over time, and informing policy and decision-making processes.

What Can Social Index be Used For

A social index can be used for various purposes, including:
  1. Assessing Social Well-being: The social index provides a quantitative measure of the overall well-being of a demographic group. It helps assess the social conditions, quality of life, and disparities within a population, allowing policymakers, researchers, and organizations to identify areas that require improvement or targeted interventions.
  2. Policy Evaluation: The index can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of social policies and interventions. By tracking changes in the social index score over time, policymakers can assess the impact of specific initiatives and make data-driven decisions regarding resource allocation and policy adjustments.
  3. Targeting Resources: The social index helps identify demographic groups or geographic regions that are facing greater social challenges or experiencing lower levels of well-being. It assists in targeting resources and interventions to address specific social issues, reduce disparities, and promote equitable development.
  4. Comparing Demographic Groups: The social index allows for comparisons between different demographic groups or across different regions. It provides insights into the relative social standing or well-being of these groups, facilitating a deeper understanding of disparities and informing policy efforts to address them.
  5. Advocacy and Awareness: The social index can be used as a tool for advocacy and raising awareness about social issues. By quantifying and visualizing social conditions, the index helps highlight areas of concern, draw attention to inequalities, and mobilize support for social change and policy reforms.
  6. Monitoring Progress: The index serves as a benchmark for monitoring progress and evaluating the impact of social development initiatives. It enables stakeholders to track changes in social indicators, identify trends, and measure the effectiveness of interventions over time.
  7. Academic and Research Purposes: The social index provides researchers with a comprehensive metric to study social phenomena and investigate the relationship between different social factors. It helps generate insights, support academic research, and contribute to the body of knowledge on social well-being and development.
  8. Overall, the social index serves as a valuable tool for understanding, measuring, and addressing social challenges. It informs policy decisions, facilitates targeted interventions, and promotes a more holistic approach to social development and well-being.