Zimbabwean vs Sudanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,617,464 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.246% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 246.2 Sudanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $84,401, a difference of 16.8%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $78,529, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $93,718, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $38,215, a difference of 6.8%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $44,419, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $46,982, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 37.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 30.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.9%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (64.1% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.8%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.1%).