Nonimmigrants vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,317,862 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,426 compared to $77,465, a difference of 34.9%), median household income ($79,429 compared to $98,496, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,448 compared to $116,156, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 5.0%), median male earnings ($52,170 compared to $56,872, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($44,117 compared to $48,836, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (18.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 53.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 51.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.4%), receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 30.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 66.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.1%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.0%), and births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.8%), family households (64.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.40%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.0%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and associate's degree (42.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 40.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.4%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%).