Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina

Chinese

Average
Exceptional
6,212
SOCIAL INDEX
59.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
160th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,442,734 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina corresponds to an increase of 3.2 Chinese.
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Integration in Chinese Communities

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,986 compared to $77,465, a difference of 38.4%), median household income ($79,888 compared to $98,496, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,288 compared to $116,156, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($38,886 compared to $41,461, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($45,600 compared to $48,836, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaChinese
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,278
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,432
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$79,888
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,600
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,869
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,886
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,565
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,819
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,288
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,986
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.8%
Average
25.9%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 38.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 38.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.1%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaChinese
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Average
29.2%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.3%
Exceptional
9.8%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 45.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.13%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaChinese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.89%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.5%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.8%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.8%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.1%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.3%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Exceptional
84.1%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.29%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaChinese
Family Households
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Fair
46.1%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Excellent
30.2%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 65.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 36.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.9%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaChinese
No Vehicles Available
Good
9.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.2%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.62%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaChinese
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.2%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Excellent
93.0%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.8%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.2%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.6%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.3%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.8%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.45%), disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaChinese
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.2%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Fair
3.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%