Immigrants from India vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from India
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from India

Chinese

Exceptional
Exceptional
10,255
SOCIAL INDEX
100/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
1st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Immigrants from India Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,132,384 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from India communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from India within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from India corresponds to an increase of 0.1 Chinese.
Immigrants from India Integration in Chinese Communities

Immigrants from India vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($74,207 compared to $56,872, a difference of 30.5%), median earnings ($60,648 compared to $48,836, a difference of 24.2%), and wage/income gap (31.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,914 compared to $58,162, a difference of 3.0%), householder income over 65 years ($72,804 compared to $77,465, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($132,488 compared to $116,156, a difference of 14.1%).
Immigrants from India vs Chinese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from IndiaChinese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$55,268
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$134,028
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$113,009
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$60,648
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$74,207
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$48,292
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$59,914
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$124,238
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$132,488
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,804
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
31.5%
Average
25.9%

Immigrants from India vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 32.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (11.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (23.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from India vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from IndiaChinese
Poverty
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
23.8%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.6%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
9.8%

Immigrants from India vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from India vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from IndiaChinese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
3.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from India vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Immigrants from India vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from IndiaChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.3%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.0%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.4%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.7%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.1%

Immigrants from India vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 32.1%), family households with children (31.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and divorced or separated (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from India vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from IndiaChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
67.4%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
31.0%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
52.7%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.21
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
51.8%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
22.9%
Excellent
30.2%

Immigrants from India vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 39.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from India vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from IndiaChinese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from India vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 60.3%), master's degree (22.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 53.1%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (92.0% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 11th grade (94.5% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
Immigrants from India vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from IndiaChinese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.7%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
74.4%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
69.6%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
58.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
22.3%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from India vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 45.5%), ambulatory disability (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.0%), and male disability (9.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from India vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from IndiaChinese
Disability
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.2%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%