Zimbabwean vs Armenian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,697,741 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Armenians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.306. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.067% in Armenians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 66.6 Armenians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,656, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $48,287, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $107,002, a difference of 0.14%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $109,692, a difference of 0.29%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $91,807, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 35.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 28.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 32.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.9%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.46%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 42.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 58.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.8%).