Zimbabwean vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Ute

Exceptional
Fair
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,820,002 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 42.7 Ute.
Zimbabwean Integration in Ute Communities

Zimbabwean vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $83,937, a difference of 27.3%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $87,596, a difference of 25.6%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $72,402, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $49,997, a difference of 2.5%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $48,899, a difference of 15.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Ute Income
Income MetricZimbabweanUte
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.8%

Zimbabwean vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (10.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 59.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 57.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.9%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 19.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanUte
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.7%

Zimbabwean vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 47.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 45.7%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanUte
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%

Zimbabwean vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
76.6%

Zimbabwean vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.0%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 6.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanUte
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Poor
33.0%

Zimbabwean vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.9%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 28.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 11.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanUte
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
8.8%

Zimbabwean vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 51.2%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 40.1%), and associate's degree (51.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
Zimbabwean vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanUte
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%

Zimbabwean vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 36.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanUte
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.5%