Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Potawatomi

Exceptional
Fair
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Potawatomi Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,256,961 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.816. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.515% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 515.4 Potawatomi.
Zimbabwean Integration in Potawatomi Communities

Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $84,613, a difference of 26.3%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $72,576, a difference of 24.9%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $88,265, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $46,462, a difference of 10.3%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $48,768, a difference of 15.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Income
Income MetricZimbabweanPotawatomi
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$38,046
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$88,265
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$72,576
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$41,288
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$48,768
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$34,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$46,462
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$81,774
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$84,613
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$54,212
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.7%

Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 41.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 38.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 16.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanPotawatomi
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
23.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
16.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
21.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
15.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
34.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Poor
12.5%

Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanPotawatomi
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanPotawatomi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
62.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
80.0%

Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 26.3%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanPotawatomi
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
36.2%

Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.32%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanPotawatomi
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
8.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.3%

Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 46.9%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 46.0%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).
Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanPotawatomi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Average
89.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
61.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
54.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
40.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.6%

Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 41.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Potawatomi Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanPotawatomi
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%