Immigrants from Moldova vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,608,826 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 29.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $77,465, a difference of 23.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $116,156, a difference of 8.2%), and median household income ($91,446 compared to $98,496, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $41,461, a difference of 2.0%), and median earnings ($50,274 compared to $48,836, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 31.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 28.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 10.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.1%), married-couple households (48.0% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 48.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.9%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.38%).