Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,403,148 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 14.9 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $53,359, a difference of 16.5%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $65,518, a difference of 16.4%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $54,938, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $69,774, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $55,932, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.87%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.66%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.71%), and family households (64.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.5%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.79%), disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.9%).