Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,832,348 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.283. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Immigrants from North Macedonia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 68.0 Immigrants from North Macedonia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $56,503, a difference of 10.2%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,175, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,804 compared to $45,622, a difference of 0.40%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,488, a difference of 0.76%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $109,136, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 16.4%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.15%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.62%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.90%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 17.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.0%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.21%), 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.2%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.1%).