Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Western Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,547,940 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.156% in Immigrants from Western Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 155.8 Immigrants from Western Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $50,065, a difference of 9.3%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $60,334, a difference of 7.2%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $64,933, a difference of 1.4%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $91,936, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $108,824, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 14.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.58%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 8.3%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.57%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.0%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.1%).