Zimbabwean vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Hmong

Exceptional
Average
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,545,087 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.776% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 775.7 Hmong.
Zimbabwean Integration in Hmong Communities

Zimbabwean vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $88,115, a difference of 21.3%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $91,296, a difference of 20.5%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $38,120, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $49,364, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $42,111, a difference of 14.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Hmong Income
Income MetricZimbabweanHmong
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.7%

Zimbabwean vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 22.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanHmong
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Average
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.9%

Zimbabwean vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 57.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanHmong
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%

Zimbabwean vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
81.7%

Zimbabwean vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.1%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.15%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.27%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.88%).
Zimbabwean vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanHmong
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
27.7%

Zimbabwean vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanHmong
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.0%

Zimbabwean vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.7%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 38.8%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.22%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
Zimbabwean vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanHmong
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.6%

Zimbabwean vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanHmong
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
2.4%