Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,452,560 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.247% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 246.7 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $82,254, a difference of 19.9%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $93,593, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $47,916, a difference of 7.0%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $37,965, a difference of 7.5%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $43,416, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 36.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.36%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 17.0%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.4%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (64.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.1%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.9%).