Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,326,773 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.461. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.378% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 377.7 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $119,756, a difference of 21.5%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $67,353, a difference of 19.6%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $54,264, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $69,174, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $57,931, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.48%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.89%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 67.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 48.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.9%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 22.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.1%).