Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Pakistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,542,193 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.342% in Immigrants from Pakistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 342.0 Immigrants from Pakistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $56,789, a difference of 10.8%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $60,987, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $106,129, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $66,617, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $47,084, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 20.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 8.4%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.30, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.28%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.030%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 2.9%).