Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Portugal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Portugal

Chinese

Poor
Exceptional
2,067
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
271st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Portugal Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,669,421 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.176. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.070% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 70.2 Chinese.
Immigrants from Portugal Integration in Chinese Communities

Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $77,465, a difference of 38.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $116,156, a difference of 17.1%), and median household income ($84,740 compared to $98,496, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $56,872, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and median earnings ($47,304 compared to $48,836, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PortugalChinese
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,412
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,984
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Average
$84,740
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Good
$47,304
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,182
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,788
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,105
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,512
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,203
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,924
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Average
25.9%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 46.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.4%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PortugalChinese
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Fair
9.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Average
11.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Average
13.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
9.8%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 77.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 42.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.1%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PortugalChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.80%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PortugalChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.6%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
84.1%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 39.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.5%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.0%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.5%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PortugalChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Excellent
30.2%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 44.5%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 28.0%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PortugalChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 81.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.8%), and associate's degree (40.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PortugalChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.3%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.7%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.9%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.1%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.2%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 57.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 36.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), male disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PortugalChinese
Disability
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.6%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.6%