Zimbabwean vs Chilean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Chilean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Chileans
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chilean Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,462,643 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.653. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 142.2 Chileans.
Zimbabwean vs Chilean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $53,185, a difference of 3.8%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $63,957, a difference of 3.0%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $108,429, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($90,618 compared to $90,605, a difference of 0.020%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,757, a difference of 0.10%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Chilean |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Exceptional $46,459 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Exceptional $108,429 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Exceptional $90,605 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Exceptional $48,504 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Exceptional $56,973 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Exceptional $40,757 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Exceptional $53,185 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Exceptional $99,900 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Exceptional $106,611 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Exceptional $63,957 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Fair 26.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Chilean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.21%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Chilean |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Excellent 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 11.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Chilean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Chilean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Chilean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.83%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Chilean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Chilean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 6.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.010%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Chilean |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Good 30.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.64%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Chilean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Good 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Excellent 56.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Good 6.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Chilean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Chilean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Excellent 91.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Exceptional 62.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Zimbabwean vs Chilean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.9%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.95%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Chilean |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 22.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.3% |