Zimbabwean vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,390,692 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.744. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.205% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 204.7 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $49,173, a difference of 7.3%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $60,350, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $104,578, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $65,326, a difference of 0.81%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $52,540, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.7%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 45.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.4%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.9% compared to 69.9%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.44%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.0%).