Zimbabwean vs South American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,766,042 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.091% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 90.9 South Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $59,854, a difference of 10.0%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $101,856, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $100,837, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,698, a difference of 2.8%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $46,804, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $54,492, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.4%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 31.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 10.7%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.67%), female disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.3%).