Zimbabwean vs Guatemalan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Guatemalan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Guatemalans
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Guatemalan Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,099,188 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.112% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 111.9 Guatemalans.
Zimbabwean vs Guatemalan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $88,295, a difference of 24.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $87,705, a difference of 21.8%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $37,766, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,525, a difference of 0.52%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $35,695, a difference of 14.3%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.3%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Guatemalan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $37,766 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $88,295 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $75,961 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $41,205 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $46,736 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $35,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Poor $51,525 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $82,331 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $87,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $54,526 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 22.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Guatemalan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 72.5%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 52.1%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.8%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Guatemalan |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 21.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 21.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 21.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 23.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 14.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Guatemalan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Guatemalan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Guatemalan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Tragic 35.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 81.2% |
Zimbabwean vs Guatemalan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.1%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 29.4%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Guatemalan |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 43.3% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.40 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 37.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.93%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Guatemalan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Guatemalan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 100.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 61.0%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Guatemalan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 94.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 91.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 89.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 87.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Tragic 86.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 82.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 78.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 56.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 31.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Guatemalan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Guatemalan |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 25.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |