Zimbabwean vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,826,510 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 43.5 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $88,717, a difference of 24.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $86,595, a difference of 23.4%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $73,509, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $48,603, a difference of 5.5%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $35,864, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 51.1%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 50.6%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 15.6%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 30.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 32.2%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.9%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.48%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.1%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 49.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.8%).