Zimbabwean vs Belgian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,920,102 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Belgians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Belgians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 59.5 Belgians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $59,915, a difference of 9.9%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $84,008, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $55,361, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,113, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $46,375, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.2%), single female poverty (19.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.1%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 10.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.47%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.5%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.5%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.5%).