Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Pakistan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Pakistan

Chinese

Good
Exceptional
8,130
SOCIAL INDEX
78.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
86th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Pakistan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,535,761 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Pakistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.780. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Pakistan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Pakistan corresponds to an increase of 45.1 Chinese.
Immigrants from Pakistan Integration in Chinese Communities

Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,617 compared to $77,465, a difference of 16.3%), median male earnings ($60,987 compared to $56,872, a difference of 7.2%), and median earnings ($51,693 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($97,528 compared to $98,496, a difference of 0.99%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,434 compared to $116,156, a difference of 1.5%), and median family income ($114,406 compared to $116,188, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PakistanChinese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,084
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,406
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,528
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,693
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,987
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,052
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$56,789
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,129
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,434
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,617
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Average
25.9%

Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 33.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 31.8%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.1%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PakistanChinese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.4%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.0%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.8%

Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 45.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PakistanChinese
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.26%).
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PakistanChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.9%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Exceptional
84.1%

Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (30.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 16.3%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (50.1% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 0.44%), family households (67.7% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and currently married (49.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.90%).
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PakistanChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
67.7%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.2%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.1%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.30
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.1%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.2%
Excellent
30.2%

Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 38.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 20.7%).
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PakistanChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.6%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
56.1%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.7%), master's degree (17.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 22.0%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.0% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%).
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PakistanChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.4%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.0%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.1%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.8%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.2%), male disability (9.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PakistanChinese
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%