Zimbabwean vs Belizean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Belizean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Belizeans

Exceptional
Tragic
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,156
SOCIAL INDEX
9.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
320th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Belizean Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,369,355 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Belizeans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.805% in Belizeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 804.6 Belizeans.
Zimbabwean Integration in Belizean Communities

Zimbabwean vs Belizean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 23.9%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $90,880, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $54,580, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,094, a difference of 0.32%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $37,429, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $42,702, a difference of 12.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Belizean Income
Income MetricZimbabweanBelizean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$39,097
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$90,880
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$77,028
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$42,702
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$48,358
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$37,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$51,094
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$84,534
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$88,684
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$54,580
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
21.2%

Zimbabwean vs Belizean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 60.5%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 56.4%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.7%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Belizean Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanBelizean
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
11.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
20.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
22.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Average
16.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
31.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.8%

Zimbabwean vs Belizean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 39.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.5%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Belizean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanBelizean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.5%

Zimbabwean vs Belizean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Belizean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanBelizean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
78.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
32.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
73.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
80.8%

Zimbabwean vs Belizean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 29.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.48%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Belizean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanBelizean
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Excellent
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.39
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
42.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
37.0%

Zimbabwean vs Belizean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 58.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 9.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Belizean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanBelizean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
14.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
85.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
51.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
18.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Average
6.3%

Zimbabwean vs Belizean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 73.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 63.0%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Belizean Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanBelizean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
93.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
93.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
88.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
87.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
84.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
80.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
54.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
40.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
32.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Zimbabwean vs Belizean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Belizean Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanBelizean
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
25.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
49.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%