Zimbabwean vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,024,509 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 61.8 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $52,391, a difference of 14.4%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $64,253, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $110,318, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $68,037, a difference of 3.3%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,266, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.9%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.66%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.0%), female disability (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.6%).