French Canadian vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

French Canadian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

French Canadians

Chinese

Average
Exceptional
5,542
SOCIAL INDEX
52.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
175th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in French Canadian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,054,535 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 7.1 Chinese.
French Canadian Integration in Chinese Communities

French Canadian vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $77,465, a difference of 33.6%), median household income ($82,810 compared to $98,496, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $116,156, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $56,872, a difference of 3.9%), median earnings ($46,026 compared to $48,836, a difference of 6.1%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $46,098, a difference of 7.2%).
French Canadian vs Chinese Income
Income MetricFrench CanadianChinese
Per Capita Income
Fair
$43,003
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,634
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,810
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Fair
$46,026
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,722
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,436
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,672
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,694
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,093
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,975
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Average
25.9%

French Canadian vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (22.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 35.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 16.5%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 18.0%).
French Canadian vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricFrench CanadianChinese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Exceptional
9.8%

French Canadian vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 89.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.4%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.8%).
French Canadian vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFrench CanadianChinese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

French Canadian vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.97%).
French Canadian vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFrench CanadianChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.1%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Exceptional
84.1%

French Canadian vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.0%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.48%), currently married (48.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
French Canadian vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFrench CanadianChinese
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.07
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.4%
Excellent
30.2%

French Canadian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
French Canadian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFrench CanadianChinese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.8%

French Canadian vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.2%), associate's degree (44.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).
French Canadian vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricFrench CanadianChinese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.2%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.8%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.1%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Fair
1.8%

French Canadian vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.32%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
French Canadian vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricFrench CanadianChinese
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
13.6%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.0%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%