Basque vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,807,549 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Basque communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Basques within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Basques corresponds to a decrease of 14.9 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,653 compared to $77,465, a difference of 23.6%), median household income ($87,001 compared to $98,496, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,387 compared to $116,156, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,086 compared to $46,098, a difference of 2.2%), median male earnings ($55,370 compared to $56,872, a difference of 2.7%), and median earnings ($46,399 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 34.1%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 32.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.96%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.5%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.7%), currently married (48.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.58%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and associate's degree (46.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Basque and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.27%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.44%).