Chippewa vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,798,130 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 4.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $77,465, a difference of 43.9%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $98,496, a difference of 39.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $116,156, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.7%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $41,461, a difference of 18.4%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $48,836, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 79.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 76.7%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.1%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 41.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 43.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 96.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 70.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.7%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 54.5%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.8%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (62.1% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.9%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.7%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 51.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.61%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 8.5%).