Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Tohono O'odham

Exceptional
Tragic
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,875,354 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.681. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.237% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 1,236.8 Tohono O'odham.
Zimbabwean Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $72,193, a difference of 52.4%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $30,256, a difference of 51.4%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $61,663, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $45,248, a difference of 13.3%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $33,205, a difference of 22.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricZimbabweanTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
22.1%

Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 175.0%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 161.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 126.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 41.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 51.8%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 54.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
21.5%

Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 120.2%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 112.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 103.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.9%

Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 10.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
75.1%

Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 73.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 72.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.34%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (64.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanTohono O'odham
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
49.8%

Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 72.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 82.6%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 82.6%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.42%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%).
Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 85.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 67.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%