Peruvian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,555,218 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Peruvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Peruvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Peruvians corresponds to an increase of 7.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,766 compared to $77,465, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,070 compared to $116,156, a difference of 10.5%), and median family income ($105,444 compared to $116,188, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.2%), median male earnings ($55,659 compared to $56,872, a difference of 2.2%), and median earnings ($47,628 compared to $48,836, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 47.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 45.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.30 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.3%), family households (67.1% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 37.0%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 62.2%), college, under 1 year (64.1% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and college, 1 year or more (58.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (38.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.8%), male disability (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.0%).