Zimbabwean vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,640,174 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 104.6 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $104,993, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,369, a difference of 6.1%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $59,351, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.24%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $66,306, a difference of 0.69%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $112,859, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.5%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.1%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.77%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.6%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.25%), disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.35%).