Laotian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Chinese
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,866,085 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.203% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 203.3 Chinese.
Laotian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $77,465, a difference of 16.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $58,162, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $116,156, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $104,264, a difference of 0.70%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.6%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Average 25.9% |
Laotian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 35.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.0%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.0%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Laotian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Laotian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Laotian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.1%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.18%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (65.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Excellent 30.2% |
Laotian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Laotian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.5% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.77%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 1.8% |
Laotian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.2%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |