Zimbabwean vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,431,525 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 9.2 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.3%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $103,624, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $62,215, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,019, a difference of 1.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $96,497, a difference of 2.2%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $46,952, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.6%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.83%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 10.6%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.19%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.4%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.59%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.4%).