Choctaw vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Chinese
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,816,062 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.762% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 762.0 Chinese.
Choctaw vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $77,465, a difference of 46.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $116,156, a difference of 41.2%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $98,496, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 8.6%), median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $56,872, a difference of 19.2%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $48,836, a difference of 21.3%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Average 25.9% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 79.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 79.8%), and family poverty (11.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (20.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 34.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 36.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 38.2%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.4%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.9%), family households (64.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 7.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Excellent 30.2% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.5%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.2%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 32.1%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Choctaw vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 8.1%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.7%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |